In W.P.(C) No.751 of 2015, the High Court of Orissa at Cuttack dismissed the petition on merits on the grounds of non-prosecution by the petitioner's counsel despite an adjournment having been granted.
Writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution due to absence of petitioner's counsel.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.751 of 2015
Jhunurani Panda & others ..……. Petitioners Mr. Sanjib Ray, Adv.
-Versus-
State of Odisha & others
..…….. Opp. Parties
CORAM:
JUSTICE S. TALAPATRA
JUSTICE M.S. SAHOO
ORDER
18.07.2022
Order No.
05. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/
Physical Mode).
2. On 08.07.2022, adjournment was taken by Mr. S. Ray,
learned counsel for the petitioners. But none appears even for the
petitioners today.
3. Hence, this petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution.
(S. Talapatra) Judge
(M.S. Sahoo) Judge
Subhasis
2
3
Jhunurani Panda & others
State of Odisha & others
S. Talapatra
M.S. Sahoo
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
