The petition stands closed after the respondent wife stated she voluntarily left the petitioner's house and is living alone, stating she does not wish to live with him.
Petition closed as there survives nothing to proceed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
WPCRL No.43 of 2022
Bikash Chandra Nayak
State of Orissa & others
..……. Petitioner Mr. Sanjib Kumar Bhanjadeo, Adv. -Versus- ..…….. Opp. Parties Mr. S.S. Kanungo, AGA
CORAM:
Order No. 03.
JUSTICE S. TALAPATRA
JUSTICE M.S. SAHOO
ORDER
27.06.2022
2. Heard. 3. Mr. S.S. Kanungo, learned Addl. Government Advocate has produced instruction in writing from the I.I.C., Laxmisagar Police Station, Bhubaneswar. From the said instruction, it transpires that, the petitioner’s wife, name withheld for protecting her identity, has appeared before the said Police Officer and stated that, she had not been abducted by Opp. Party No.4. She had left the petitioner’s house voluntarily and on her own will. Now, she is living alone. She has further stated that, she is not inclined to live with the petitioner.
4. In view of that, this petition stands closed, as there survives nothing to proceed for.
2
5. Mr. S.K. Bhanjadeo, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner.
6. It is needless to say, the petitioner is at liberty to take appropriate action at his end.
(S. Talapatra) Judge
(M.S. Sahoo) Judge
Subhasis
3
4
Bikash Chandra Nayak
State of Orissa & others
S. Talapatra
M.S. Sahoo
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
