The appeal was dismissed due to non-prosecution as no representation appeared for the appellant on the scheduled date, following previous warnings of appropriate orders for non-appearance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
MATA No. 12 of 2021
Pitabas Nayak …... Appellant Mr. M. Padhy, Advocate
-versus-
Puspanjali Nayak …… Respondent
CORAM: JUSTICE S. TALAPATRA JUSTICE M.S. SAHOO
ORDER
27.06.2022
Order No.
(S. Talapatra) Judge
(M.S. Sahoo) Judge
Murmu
Pitabas Nayak
Puspanjali Nayak
S. Talapatra
M.S. Sahoo
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
