The High Court of Orissa dismissed a writ petition as not pressed after the petitioner's counsel informed the court that the parties had remarried following the divorce decree.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
WPCRL No.20 of 2022
Prasanna Kumar Jena
..……. Petitioner
Mr. Rituranjan Chhotray, Adv.
-Versus-
Superintendent of Police (Rural), Cuttack & others
..…….. Opp. Parties
Mr. S.S. Kanungo, AGA
CORAM:
JUSTICE S. TALAPATRA JUSTICE M.S. SAHOO
ORDER
27.06.2022
Order No.
1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/ Physical Mode).
2. Mr. R.R. Chhotray, learned counsel, appearing for the petitioner by virtual mode, has submitted that, he has instruction from the petitioner to not press this petition.
3. The parties have married after the decree of divorce is granted. Accordingly, the petition stands dismissed as not pressed. 4. Draw the decree accordingly.
(S. Talapatra) Judge
(M.S. Sahoo) Judge
Subhasis
2
3
Prasanna Kumar Jena
Superintendent of Police (Rural), Cuttack & others
S. Talapatra
M.S. Sahoo
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
