This judgment holds that the writ petition is infructuous due to the efflux of time. The petitioner is directed to pursue remedy under the applicable agreement or DTCN before the appropriate forum.
The writ petition stands disposed with liberty to pursue remedy under the agreement or DTCN before the appropriate forum.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P (C) No. 6211 of 2017
M/s D.K. Construction
….. Petitioner
Mr. J.K. Mohapatra, Adv.
Vs.
State of Odisha and others
….. Opposite Parties State Counsel
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI MR. JUSTICE V. NARASINGH
ORDER
11.07.2022
Ashok/Santoshi
Page 1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition stands infructuous due to efflux of time and the petitioner should pursue remedy under the agreement/DTCN.
M/s D.K. Construction
State of Odisha
DR. B.R. SARANGI
V. NARASINGH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
