The High Court of Orissa at Cuttack declined to entertain a writ petition challenging an interim order of the Odisha Administrative Tribunal Cuttack Bench as the main case was pending pending after the Tribunal's abolition. Liberty was granted to pursue the main case.
Liberty granted to the petitioner to pursue the main case.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P (C) No. 18157 of 2019
State of Odisha and others
….. Petitioners
Additional Government Advocate
Vs.
Dinesh Kumar Mishra and another
….. Opposite Parties
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI
MR. JUSTICE V. NARASINGH
ORDER
11.07.2022
Order No. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
03.
interim order passed by the Odisha Administrative Tribunal, Cuttack Bench, Cuttack and the main case is pending for adjudication before this Court after abolition of the Tribunal, this Court is not inclined to entertain this Writ Petition. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to pursue the main case.
(DR. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE
Alok
(V. NARASINGH) JUDGE
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should entertain a writ petition challenging an interim order of the Odisha Administrative Tribunal, Cuttack Bench
State of Odisha and others
Dinesh Kumar Mishra and another
B.R. Sarangi
V. Narasihmgh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
