A writ petition was disposed of as infructuous. The petitioner's counsel stated that the petition had become infructuous due to the efflux of time.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P (C) No. 21529 of 2016
Kishore Chandra Ray
….. Petitioner
Mr. G.R. Sethi, Advocate
Vs. ….. Additional D.G. of Police, Sap, Opposite Parties Orissa, Cuttack and others
State counsel
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI
MR. JUSTICE V. NARASINGH
ORDER
08.07.2022
Order No. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
03.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner stated that the writ
petition has become infructuous by efflux of time.
3. In view of the above, the writ petition stands disposed
of as infructuous.
(DR. B.R. SARANGI)
JUDGE
Alok/Subhasmita (V. NARASINGH)
JUDGE
Page 1 of 1
Kishore Chandra Ray
Additional D.G. of Police, Sap, Opposite Parties Orissa, Cuttack and others
B.R. Sarangi
V. Narasingh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
