The writ petition in W.P.(C) No.20253 of 2012 was dismissed for non-prosecution due to the petitioner's lack of instructions. The order contains no substantive legal principles.
The writ petition was dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.20253 of 2012
Indrajit Sarkar …. Petitioner Mr. K.P. Mishra, Advocate -versus-
…. Union of India and others Opposite Parties Mr. B. Nayak, CGC
CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE R. K. PATTANAIK
ORDER
22.06.2022
Order No.
03. 1. Learned counsel for the Petitioner states that he has no
instructions.
2. The writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
(Dr. S. Muralidhar)
Chief Justice
(R. K. Pattanaik)
Judge
TUDU
Indrajit Sarkar
Union of India
R. K. Pattanaik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
