Sudarshan Nayak, IAS v. State of Odisha
Case brief
What is this about?
Supreme Court relied upon the judgment in Civil Appeal Nos.4515 and 4516 of 2022 to dispose of the writ petition by staying the order under appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No. 12490 of 2022
Sudarshan Nayak and another …. Petitioners
Mr. D.K. Jena, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha and others
…. Opposite Parties Mr. A.K. Parija, Advocate General along with Mr. Debakanta Mohanty, AGA Mr. P.K. Parhi, ASGI Mr. D. Tripathy, CGC
CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE R. K. PATTANAIK ORDER
Order No.
22.06.2022
(Dr. S. Muralidhar) Chief Justice
(R. K. Pattanaik) Judge
S. Behera
Sudarshan Nayak
another
State of Odisha
others
R. K. Pattanaik
S. Muralidhar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court