Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Rameswarlal Shyam Vs State — Service and Employment | Orissa HC (2022)

Home
Orissa HC
2022
Rameswarlal Shyam Vs StateRameswarlal Shyam v. State

Dismissed

Rameswarlal Shyam v. State

Orissa HC22 Jun 2022STREV/523/2008

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court at Cuttack dismissed a revision petition which was not pressed by the petitioner's counsel; legal questions were left open.

What did the court decide?

Revision petition dismissed as not pressed.

What the court decided

AI extract

A

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK STREV No. 523 of 2008

M/s. Rameswarlal Shyam Sundar

…. Petitioner

Mr. Jagabandhu Sahoo, Senior Advocate

-versus-

… State of Odisha, represented by the Opposite Party Commissioner of Sales Tax

Mr. Sunil Mishra, Addl. Standing Counsel

CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE R.K. PATTANAIK

ORDER

Order No.

22.06.2022

Parties & counsel

AI extract

petitioner
M/s. Rameswarlal Shyam Sundar
respondent
State of Odisha

Coram

AI extract

R.K. Pattanaik

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Orissa HC
Decided on: 22 Jun 2022 · June
Registered: 1 Dec 2008
Case no.: STREV/523/2008

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from S. Muralidhar CJ R.k.pattanaik

M/S.B.G.Pharmaceutic Vs State
21 Jun 2022
Sahadeb Sethi Vs State of Orissa
21 Jun 2022
M/S.Jeypore Sugar Vs State
21 Jun 2022
Bishnu Charan Swain Vs State and Ors.
22 Jun 2022

Cite this judgement

Rameswarlal Shyam v. State, STREV/523/2008 (OD), decided on 22 June 2022.

The High Court of Orissa publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Bench / Coram

R.K. Pattanaik and R.K. Pattanaik and S.M. Sahoo

Parties & counsel

Outcome

Revision petition dismissed as not pressed.

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Revision petition dismissed as not pressed by the petitioner. Questions of law raised were left open for consideration in some other appropriate case. No substantive decision made on merits.

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

Mr. Jagabandhu Sahoo, learned Senior Advocate appearing for the Petitioner states that he is not pressing this petition.

The revision petition is dismissed as not pressed. The questions of law, urged in this revision petition, are however left open for consideration in some other appropriate case.

(Dr. S. Muralidhar) Chief Justice

(R.K. Pattanaik)

Judge

S.K. Jena/Secy.

R.K. Pattanaik

S.M. Sahoo

CNR

ODHC010436802008

Topic

Service and Employment

Bench

S. Muralidhar CJ R.k.pattanaik

Disposal

Disposed Off

Sudarshan Nayak, IAS Vs State of Odisha

22 Jun 2022

Gitanjali Cement Pro Vs State

22 Jun 2022