M/S.Jeypore Sugar v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court of Orissa dismissed two revision petitions (Nos. 447, 448) for non-prosecution by the petitioner, who failed to appear. One revenue staff member appeared for the State.
What did the court decide?
LCR be returned forthwith.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
STREV Nos.447, 448 and 449 of 2008
M/s. Jeypore Sugar Co. Ltd. …. Petitioner None -versus…. State of Orissa represented by the Opposite Party Commissioner of Sales Tax, Orissa, Cuttack
Mr. Sunil Mishra, Additional Standing Counsel
CORAM:
THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE R.K. PATTANAIK
ORDER
21.06.2022
Order No.
05. 1. None appears for the Petitioner.
2. Accordingly, the revision petitions are dismissed for non-
prosecution. LCR be returned forthwith.
(Dr. S. Muralidhar)
Chief Justice
(R.K. Pattanaik)
Judge
S.K. Guin
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
M/s. Jeypore Sugar Co. Ltd.
- respondent
State of Orissa
Coram
R.K. Pattanaik
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court