Disposed
Ratikanta Panigrahi v. State of Odisha
Orissa HCWP(C)/18717/2016
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
of 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P. (C) No. 18717 OF 2016
Ratikanta Panigrahi
……… Petitioner Mr. G.R. Sethy, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha & Others
...……… Opposite Parties State Counsel
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI
MR. JUSTICE V.NARASINGH
ORDER
11.07.2022
Order No.
05. 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
2. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
3. It is stated that by efflux of time, the writ petition has
become infructuous.
4. In view of the above submission, this writ petition stands
disposed of as infructuous.
Ashok/Balaram
( Dr. B.R. SARANGI )
Judge
( V.NARASINGH )
Judge
Page 1 of 1
Ratikanta Panigrahi
State of Odisha & Others
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI
MR. JUSTICE V.NARASINGH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court