Gitanjali Cement Pro v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
A revision petition was dismissed due to the non-appearance of the petitioner for want of prosecution on 22.06.2022.
What did the court decide?
The revision petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK STREV No. 46 of 2009
Gitanjali Cement Products …. Petitioner None -versus… State of Odisha, represented by the Opposite Party Commissioner of Commercial Taxes
Mr. Sunil Mishra, Addl. Standing Counsel
CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE R.K. PATTANAIK
ORDER
Order No. 22.06.2022
03. 1. None appears for the Petitioner.
2. The revision petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
(Dr. S. Muralidhar)
Chief Justice
(R.K. Pattanaik)
Judge
S.K. Jena/Secy.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Gitanjali Cement Products
- respondent
State of Odisha represented by the Opposite Party Commissioner of Commercial Taxes
Coram
R.K. Pattanaik
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court