Sudarshan Jena v. State of Odisha
Case brief
What is this about?
This matter is taken up through Video…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WPCRL No.147 of 2020
This matter is taken up through Video Conferencing because of COVID-19 pandemic.
Heard Mr. T. Barik, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. A.K. Nanda, learned Additional Government Advocate for the State.
Perused the report submitted.
It appears that the victim girl has already been rescued; her statement has been recorded under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C. and as she is not interested to join her parents, she has been left the safe custody of Swadhar Home, Dhakota, District- Keonjhar.
In that view of the matter, this WPCRL has become infructuous.
The WPCRL is disposed of as infructuous.
As restrictions are continuing due to COVID-19 pandemic, learned counsel for the parties may utilize the soft copy of this order available in the High Court’s official website or print out thereof at par with certified copies in the manner prescribed, vide Court’s Notice No.4587, dated 25.03.2020.
………………………..
S. K. Mishra, J.
Savitri Ratho, J.
BJ
S. K. Mishra
Savitri Ratho
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court