Sk. Ayub Mahammad v. State of Odisha
Case brief
What is this about?
This matter is taken up through Video…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WPCRL No.92 of 2020
This matter is taken up through Video Conferencing because of COVID-19 pandemic.
Heard Mr. P.K. Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner and Smt. S. Pattnaik, learned Additional Government Advocate for the State.
Both the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Government Advocate for the State submit that the victim girl has been rescued on 25.12.2020 and after all formalities, she has been handed over to her parents.
In that view of the matter, this WPCRL has become infructuous.
The WPCRL is disposed of as infructuous.
As restrictions are continuing due to COVID-19 pandemic, learned counsel for the parties may utilize the soft copy of this order available in the High Court’s official website or print out thereof at par with certified copies in the manner prescribed, vide Court’s Notice No.4587, dated 25.03.2020.
……………………….. S. K. Mishra, J.
….………………………. Savitri Ratho, J.
BJ
S. K. Mishra
Savitri Ratho
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court