Trilochan Sahu v. State of Odisha
Case brief
What is this about?
The matter is taken up through video…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(C) No.1 OF 2021
The matter is taken up through video conferencing. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking direction to opposite party no.2 to dispose of the representation within a stipulated time and include the name of the petitioner in the gradation list prepared on 04.03.2020, as he is entitled to get promotion from GRS to Panchayat Executive Officer of Khemesara G.P.
In course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner states that highlighting the grievances, the petitioner has made representation to opposite party no.2 vide Annexure-7 and the same may be directed to be disposed of within a stipulated time.
Considering the limited grievance of the petitioner, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, disposes of the writ petition directing opposite party no.2 to consider the representation filed by the petitioner vide Annexure-7 and pass appropriate order in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of production of authenticated/certified copy this order.
…………….…………… (DR. B.R. SARANGI)
JUDGE
Ashok
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to a direction to dispose of his representation regarding promotion and its inclusion in the gradation list within a specific timeframe without the court expressing
The Petitioner
Opposite Party No.2
Dr. B.R. Sarangi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court