Dismissed
Radhakanta Mishra v. Chithra Arumugam
Orissa HCCONTC/2327/2020
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
The matter is taken up by video conferencing…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CONTC No. 2327 of 2020
The matter is taken up by video conferencing mode. Copy of the contempt petition be served on learned State Counsel within three working days.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
It appears that the order dated 21.10.2019 passed by this Court in W.P.(C) No. 19629 of 2019 has not yet been complied with.
Let the opposite parties comply with the same, if not already complied with in the meantime, within a period of three months from the date of communication/ production of certified/authenticated copy of this order by the petitioner.
Contempt petition is accordingly disposed of.
Ashok
…………….…………… (Dr. B.R. Sarangi)
Judge
Petitioner
Opposite Parties
Dr. B.R. Sarangi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court