Ramkrishna Majhi v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
This matter is taken up through video…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(C) No. 17761 of 2014
This matter is taken up through video conferencing. None appears for the petitioner at the time of call. Heard Mr. S. Nayak, learned Addl. Standing Counsel for the State.
The petitioner has filed this writ petition challenging the order of suspension passed under Section 115(1) of the Orissa Grama Panchayat Act, 1964 in Annexure-1. In the meantime 5 years have passed and the tenure of the Sarapanch has already over. Therefore, by efflux of time, the writ petition has become infructuous.
The writ petition is accordingly disposed of as infructuous.
(DR. B.R. SARANGI, J)
Ajaya
1 provisions across 1 enactments
W.P.(C) No. 17761 of 2014
The State
B.R. Sarangi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court