Dismissed
Jaladhar Nayak v. State of Odisha
Orissa HCWP(C)/34020/2020
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
The matter is taken up through video…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(C) No.34020 OF 2020
02 15.01.2021 The matter is taken up through video conferencing mode.
Heard Mr. U.C. Jena, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. A.K. Sharma, learned Additional Government Advocate for the State-opposite parties.
The petitioner has filed this writ petition alleging noncompliance of the order passed by this Court in W.P.(C) No.19487 of 2018.
Mr. A.K. Sharma, learned Additional Government Advocate for the State-opposite parties contended that if the opposite party-authority has not complied with the order passed by this Court in W.P.(C) No.19487 of 2018, the petitioner has to file a properly constituted petition. Because, for the self-same cause of action, filing of second writ petition is not maintainable.
Considering the contentions raised by learned counsel for the parties, it appears that the petitioner has filed this writ petition for non-compliance of the order passed by this Court in W.P.(C) No.19487 of 2018 instead of filing a properly constituted petition. Thus, the present writ petition is not maintainable before this Court. Therefore, this Court is not inclined to entertain this writ petition. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to file a properly constituted petition in accordance with law.
With the above observation, the writ petition is disposed of.
…………….……………
(DR. B.R. SARANGI)
JUDGE
Alok
Petitioner
State opposite parties
B.R. Sarangi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court