Tarachand Agarwal v. State and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner's writ petition held infructuous due to subsequent developments and dismissed by the High Court of Orissa at Cuttack.
What did the court decide?
Dismissed as infructuous.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No. 1349 of 2014
Tarachand Agarwal …. Petitioner
Mr. Santanu Kumar Sarangi, Advocate -versus-
…. State of Odisha and Others Opposite Parties
Mr. Debakanta Mohanty Addl. Government Advocate
CORAM:
THE CHIEF JUSTICE
JUSTICE B.P. ROUTRAY
ORDER
Order No. 29.09.2021
05. 1. Learned counsel for the Petitioner states that in view of
subsequent development the writ petition has been rendered
infructuous.
2. Dismissed as infructuous.
(Dr. S. Muralidhar) Chief Justice (B.P. Routray) Judge
S.K. Jena/P.A.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Tarachand Agarwal
- respondent
State of Odisha and Others
Coram
Chief Justice
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court