Sukanta Prusty v. C.A.T.
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Orissa dismissed the writ petition for non-prosecution as the petitioner did not appear on the date of hearing.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.10024 of 2005
Sukanta Prusty
…. Petitioner
None is present
-versus-
Union of India and Others
…. Opposite Parties Miss Siva Mohanty, CGC
CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE B. P. ROUTRAY
Order No.
ORDER
29.09.2021
1. None appears on call for the Petitioner.
2. The writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
3. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
4. An urgent certified copy of this order be issued as per rules.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Sukanta Prusty
Coram
B. P. Routray
M. K. Panda
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court