Samir Kr. Ray v. Union of India
Case brief
What is this about?
This is a dismissed writ petition where the learned counsel for the petitioner stated he had no instructions.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No. 6565 of 2007
Samir Kumar Ray
…. Petitioner Mr. A.K. Mishra, Advocate
-versus-
Union of India and Others
Opposite Parties
Mr. P.K. Parhi, Asst. Solicitor General
CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE B.P. ROUTRAY
ORDER
Order No. 28.09.2021
02. 1. Learned counsel for the Petitioner states that he has no
instructions.
2. The writ petition is dismissed for non-prospection.
(Dr. S. Muralidhar)
Chief Justice
(B.P. Routray)
Judge
S.K. Jena/P.A.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Samir Kumar Ray
- respondent
Union of India
Coram
B.P. Routray
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court