Mangalam Timbers v. M.M.T.P.Ltd.
Case brief
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK OJC No. 8573…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK OJC No. 8573 of 2000
Mangalam Timbers Products …. Petitioner Employees’ Union Mr. A. Das, Advocate -versus- The Management of Mangalam …. Opposite Parties Timbers Products Limited and another Mr. N.K. Mishra, Senior Advocate CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE B.P. ROUTRAY ORDER Order No. 28.09.2021 05. 1. Learned counsel for the Petitioner states that he has no instructions. 2. The writ petition is dismissed for non-prospection. (Dr. S. Muralidhar) Chief Justice (B.P. Routray) Judge
S.K. Jena/P.A.
Mangalam Timbers Products Employees' Union
The Management of Mangalam Timbers Products Limited
Justice B.P. Routray
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court