Petitioner sought inspection of vehicle fitness records under Motor Vehicle Rules. Court declined specific direction to inspect representation due to elapsed time and dismissed the writ petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.11567 OF 2020
Rajat Mohapatra ….. Petitioner Mr. P.K. Sahoo, Advocate Vs. State Transport ….. Opposite parties Commissioner, Odisha & Anr. Mr. P. Behera, SC Tranport Deptt.
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI
ORDER
18.08.2021
Order No. The matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
02
2. Heard Mr. P.K. Sahoo, learned counsel appearing
for the petitioner and Mr. P. Behera, learned Standing
Counsel for Transport Department.
3. The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking
direction to the opposite parties to inspect and endorse its
alteration/modification to find out its gross weight as per
Rules of the Orissa Motor Vehcile Rules, 1993 in the R.C.
Book and Fitness of the vehicle.
2
accordance with law.
Issue urgent certified copy as per rules.
DR. B.R. SARANGI, J.
Alok
Rajat Mohapatra
State Transport Commissioner, Odisha & Anr.
B.R. Sarangi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
