In this contempt proceeding, the petitioner stated he had no instructions as the case is old. The court dropped the proceedings with liberty to approach the appropriate forum.
Contempt proceedings dropped with liberty to approach the appropriate forum.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CONTC (CPC) No. 3061 of 1995
Dr. Saroj Kumar Sahoo …. Petitioner Mr. S. Patra, Advocate -Versus - State of Odisha …. Opp. Party State Counsel
CORAM: DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI
ORDER
26.10.2021
Order No.
This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
01
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that he has no
instructions, since it is an old case of the year 1995, therefore
the contempt proceeding may be dropped granting liberty to
the petitioner to approach the appropriate forum if any cause
of action still survives.
3. With the liberty aforesaid, the contempt proceeding is
dropped.
(Dr. B.R. Sarangi)
Judge
GDS
Page 1 of 1
Dr. Saroj Kumar Sahoo
State of Odisha
B.R. Sarangi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
