In a writ petition for promotion, the High Court of Orissa held that the petition became infructuous and was dismissed after the petitioner had already retired from service due to superannuation.
The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
WPC (OA) No. 2764 of 1997
…. Prafulla Chandra Pradhan
Petitioner Mr. D.K. Paridha, Advocate
-Versus -
State of Odisha and Ors. …. Opp. Parties
State Counsel
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI
ORDER
26.10.2021
Order No. 01
This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
(Dr. B.R. Sarangi) Judge
GDS
Page 1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition for promotion claim is maintainable after the petitioner has retired due to superannuation?
Prafulla Chandra Pradhan
State of Odisha
B.R. Sarangi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
