Malaya Kuamr Pradhan v. State of Odisha
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Orissa disposed of a writ petition as withdrawn by the petitioner due to the efflux of time rendering it infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
WPC (OA) No. 1234 of 2019
Malaya Kumar Pradhan …. Petitioner
Mr. S.N. Patnaik, Advocate
-Versus -
State of Odisha and Ors. …. Opp. Parties
.
State Counsel
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI
ORDER
26.10.2021
Order No.
This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
01
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the
petitioner wants to withdraw this writ petition, as by efflux of
time it has become infructuous
3. A memo to the same effect has already been filed.
4. In view of the above, the writ petition stands disposed
of as withdrawn.
(Dr. B.R. Sarangi)
Judge
GDS
Page 1 of 1
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Malaya Kumar Pradhan
State of Odisha
B.R. Sarangi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court