The High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking quashment of suspension and recovery orders as infructuous. The petitioner had retired by the time the tribunal was approached, and over three decades had elapsed, rendering the proceeding moot.
The writ petition stands dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
WPC (OA) No. 738 of 1991
Krushna Chandra Panda
….
Petitioner
M/s S.K. Dash and associates, Adv.
-Versus -
State of Orissa and others ….
Opposite Parties
Mr. M.K. Balabantray, Standing Counsel
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI
ORDER
25.10.2021
Order No.
This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
01
Page 1 of 2
petition has become infructuous.
Ashok
(Dr. B.R. Sarangi) Judge
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ petition seeking quash of suspension and recovery orders is maintainable after more than 30 years due to efflux of time.
Krushna Chandra Panda
State of Orissa
B.R. Sarangi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
