Arjun Patneya v. Anu Garg, IAS
Case brief
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CONTC…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CONTC No.4035 OF 2021
Arjun Patneya ….. Petitioner
Mr. P.K. Mohapatara,
Advocate
Vs.
Anu Garg, Secy. to Govt. of ….. Opposite parties
Odisha, Water Resources
Deptt. & Ors. State Counsel
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI
ORDER
13.08.2021
Order No. This matter is taken up by video conferencing mode.
01
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
It is stated that the order dated 18.03.2021 passed
by this Court in W.P.(C) No.9655 of 2021 has not yet been
complied with.
Let the opposite parties comply with the same, if
not already complied with in the meantime, within a period of
three months from the date of communication/ production of
authenticated/certified copy of this order by the petitioner.
Contempt petition is accordingly disposed of.
DR. B.R. SARANGI, J.
Alok
Arjun Patneya
Anu Garg
B.R. Sarangi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court