Kunendu Kishore Singh Samanta v. State of Odisha
Case brief
What is this about?
15.12.2020 This matter is taken up through…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WPCRL No.98 of 2020
Heard Mr. Jayadeba Behera, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. A.K. Nanda, learned Addl. Government Advocate.
The learned Addl. Government Advocate submits that in the meantime the victim girl has been rescued and her statement has been recorded by the jurisdictional magistrate. She has stated that she eloped with opposite party no.4-Sidhartha Pradhan and that she is not willing to go back to her parents’ house and therefore, the learned JMFC, Khandapada directed her to remain safe custody in Tapashya Seva Child Care and Institution, Nayagarh. Since the victim girl is rescued and she is willing to stay in safe custody of the Child Care and institution, the WPCRL has become infructuous and is disposed of.
As the period of COVID-19 is continuing, learned counsel for the parties may utilize the soft copy of this order available in the High Court’s website or print out thereof at par with certified copies in the manner prescribed, vide Court’s Notice No.4587, dated 25.03.2020.
……………………. S.K. Mishra, J.
……………………. Savitri Ratho,J.
PCD
2
3
Petitioner
S.K. Mishra
Savitri Ratho
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court