Single judge dismissed the writ petition noting that since objections to charges were already filed, there was no scope for further submissions, and thus entertained the petition for reasons recorded in the order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(C) No.25639 of 2020
through Video Conferencing.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
For the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has already filed objection to the charges, this Court finds, there is no scope for further submission of objection. In such view of the matter, this Court is not inclined to entertain this Writ Petition, which is hereby dismissed.
.…..….………………… (Biswanath Rath, J.)
Ayas
Petitioner
Respondent
Biswanath Rath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
