Nilakantha Hansa v. State of Odisha
Case brief
What is this about?
Disposal of an interim application as infructuous because the petitioner surrendered in the Court below. Adopted video conferencing mode for hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
BLAPL No. 41 of 2020
Nilakantha Hansa
…. Petitioner
Mr. B.B. Panda , Advocate -versus-
State of Odisha
Opp. Party
Order No.
Mr. S.K. Mishra, Addl. Standing Counsel CORAM: JUSTICE S.K. SAHOO ORDER 30.04.2021 I.A. No.44 of 2021
Since the petitioner has surrendered in the Court below as submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the interim application has become infructuous.
Accordingly, the I.A. is disposed of as infructuous.
(S.K. Sahoo)
Judge
RKM
Nilakantha Hansa
State of Odisha
S.K. Sahoo
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court