In the second bail application regarding NDPS charges, the single-judge bench found no change in circumstances compared to the earlier order. Consequently, the bench declined to reconsider the prayer for interim bail and dismissed the application.
Interim bail prayer dismissed; BLAPL dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BLAPL No.2155 of 2020
The matter is taken up through video conferencing. This is the second journey of the petitioner, who is in custody in Padwa P.S. Case No.87 of 2018 corresponding to T.R. Case No.38 of 2018 pending on the file of learned Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, Koraput, running for the alleged commission of offence under section 20 (b)(ii)(C) of the NDPS Act, in filing this application under section 439, Cr.P.C., for his release on interim bail.
03. 11.06.2020
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
Considering the submissions made and on going through the earlier order dated 18.11.2019 passed by this Court in BLAPL No.5214 of 2019 as well as the materials on record as placed, finding no such change in the circumstances; I am not inclined to reconsider the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.
The BLAPL is dismissed accordingly.
…………………..
D. Dash,J.
Basu
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the prayer for grant of bail should be reconsidered given no change in circumstances.
Petitioner
State
D. Dash
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
