Dismissed
Dr.a.Satyanarayan v. v.C.,Sbp.University
Orissa HCWP(C)/4645/2004
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The writ petition was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the petitioner's non-appearance at the hearing call.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
W.P.(C) No. 4645 of 2004
¶2
- 03.07.2019 None appears for the petitioner at the time of
¶3
call.
¶4
Mr. R.K. Dash, learned counsel for opposite party no.1 and Ms. Krantiprava Mukhi on behalf of Mr. P.R. Pattnaik, learned counsel for opposite party no.2 are present.
¶5
The writ petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution.
¶6
…………….…………… (DR. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE
¶7
Ashok
Coram
AI extract
DR. B.R. SARANGI
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court