The Court disposed of W.P.(C) No. 928 of 2013 as the petitioner admitted the writ petition had become infructuous due to the efflux of time.
The writ petition is disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(C) No. 928 of 2013
2 02.07.2019
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. S.K. Purohit, learned counsel for opposite parties no.1 and 2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner by filing a common memo in Court today, which has been tagged with the main case, i.e., W.P.(C) No.924 of 2013, states that by efflux of time the writ petition has become infructuous.
In view of the above, the writ petition stands disposed of as infructuous.
Alok
…………….…………… (DR. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE
Dr. B.R. Sarangi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
