The court dismissed a writ petition seeking interim maintenance in a family dispute because the petitioner's counsel had no instruction on the current payment status, rendering the petition maintainable in that form.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(C) No.3716 of 2017
In course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has no instruction as to whether in absence of any interim order, petitioner is going on making payment of interim maintenance to the opposite parties or not?
In view of such submission, the writ petition is dismissed for having no instruction.
Biswanath Rath, J.
uks
2
3
4
5
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition should be dismissed due to the petitioner having no instruction regarding payment of interim maintenance.
Petitioner
Opposite Parties
Biswanath Rath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
