The review petitioners appeared in person challenging an order dated 23.02.2012 passed in W.P.(C) No.14806 of 2010. The Court dismissed the review petition as entertaining it would amount to appreciation of the matter afresh, and it was pending since 2012.
The review petition is dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
RVWPET No.82 OF 2012
Heard the review petitioners in person.
By way of this review petition, the petitioners seek to challenge the order dated 23.02.2012 passed by this Court in W.P.(C) No.14806 of 2010.
Entertaining the review petition will amount to appreciation of the matter afresh on merit, which is not permissible under law.
It will not be appropriate to sat over the matter as an appellate authority.
The review petition was filed in 2012 and is pending till date. As such, it will not be appropriate to entertain the review petition at this stage.
Accordingly, the review petition is dismissed.
( K.S. Jhaveri ) Chief Justice
������.��.. ( K.R. Mohapatra ) Judge
AKK
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a review petition filed in 2012, challenging an order of 2012, be entertained in 2019 as it amounts to appreciation of the matter afresh.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
nullReferred
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Review Petitioners
K.S. Jhaveri
K.R. Mohapatra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
