The writ petition was dismissed for non-prosecution as no one appeared on behalf of the petitioner even on revised call, indicating a lack of interest in pursuing the matter. The judgment was signed by Chief Justice Vineet Saran and Judge Dr. B.R. Sarangi.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(C) No. 5943 of 2002
04. 17.08.2017 No one is present on behalf of the petitioner even on revised
call.
The matter relates to transfer of the petitioner.
It appears that the petitioner is no longer interested in pursuing this petiti
on.
The writ petition is accordingly dismissed for non-prosecution.
.......
( VINEET SARAN )
CHIEF JUSTICE
( DR. B.R. SARANGI )
JUDGE
dm
-2-
VINEET SARAN
DR. B.R. SARANGI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court