The court dismissed the writ petition on the grounds that the petitioner no longer wished to press it as the prayer had become infructuous, accepting a concurrent memo filed in court.
The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(C) No. 1953 of 2002
04. 16.08.2017 Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner
does not wish to press this petition as the prayer made in this writ petition has become infru
ctuous. A memo with the same prayer has been filed in court today, which is taken on record.
The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as infructuous.
....... ( VINEET SARAN )
CHIEF JUSTICE
...
( DR. B.R. SARANGI )
JUDGE
SKJ
-2-
VINEET SARAN
DR. B.R. SARANGI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court