Disposed

Shesadev Mallik v. State of Orissa

Orissa HC11 Sept 2017WP(C)/19233/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner sought appointment as a part-time Physical Education Instructor. The court granted liberty to file a fresh representation before the District Project Coordinator within two weeks and directed disposal within six weeks, disposing the writ application without adjudicating merits.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to file fresh representation within two weeks; direction to respondent to dispose within six weeks.

Shesadev Mallik Vs State of Orissa — Education and Admissions | Orissa HC (2017)

¶1

W.P.(C) No.19233 of 2017

¶2

11.09.2017

¶3

 Heard Mr. Mahunta, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Mohapatra, learned Stand
ing Counsel for the School & Mass Education Department.

¶4

 The grievance of the petitioner is that though he is eligible to be appointed as part
time Physical Education Instructor in the sports quota, but his case has not been considered.

¶5

 Mr. Mahunta, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that though the petiti
oner has filed a representation to the Director Sports and Youth Service Department, Bhubanesw
ar opposite party no.2 vide Annexure-8, however, he submits that liberty maybe granted to the
 petitioner to file a fresh representation before the District Project Coordinator, Sarva Siks
hya Aviyan, Ganjam-opposite party no.3 highlighting all his grievances. He further submits tha
t a direction may be issued to the opposite party no.3 to dispose of the representation within
 a specific time period.

¶6

 Considering the submissions made and without expressing any opinion on the mer
its of the case, this Court grants liberty to the petitioner to file a representation highligh
ting all his grievances before opposite party no.3 within a period of two weeks from today. In
 the event, such representation is filed along with certified copy of this order, the opposite
 party no.3 would do well to dispose of the same by passing a reasoned order in accordance wit
h law within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of such representation. This Court
 directs that in the event opposite party no.3 comes to a conclusion that the petitioner is ot
herwise eligible to be appointed as a part time instructor, he shall pass necessary orders.
 The writ application is accordingly disposed of.

¶7

 Issue urgent certified copy.

¶8

 Biswajit Mohanty, J.

Shesadev Mallik v. State of Orissa

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shesadev Mallik v. State of Orissa

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dhirendra Nag Vs State of Orissa

Dr.Ashok Ku.Sahoo Vs Ouat

Basant Ku.Baral Vs State

Malati Hansda Vs Allahabad Bank

Camma Textile and Industrial Ltd. Vs Director General of Foreign Trade

Suresh Taria Vs Union of India