Satyam Sekhar Roul v. Adjudicating Authority
Orissa HCWA/185/2017
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
185 of 2017 08. 22.08.2017 Heard Sri Saswat…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
W.A. No. 185 of 2017
¶2
08. 22.08.2017 Heard Sri Saswat K. Acharya, learned counsel for the appellant
and Sri A.K.Bose, learned Asst. Solicitor General for the respondents.
¶3
Learned counsel for the parties have jointly submitted that the issue involved
in this writ appeal is identical to one involved in Writ Appeal No. 140 of 2017 and thus pray
ed that this appeal may also be disposed of in the same terms.
¶4
Accordingly for the reasons given in the judgment and order of day passed in W
rit Appeal No. 140 of 2017 (Bharat Bhusan Swain Vs. Adjudicating Authority and others), this w
rit appeal also stands disposed of in the same terms.
¶5
The appellant is directed to participate and co-operate in the proceedings bef
ore the adjudicating authority, and not to seek any unnecessary adjournments
¶6
.......
( VINEET SARAN )
CHIEF JUSTICE
....
( DR. B.R.SARANGI ) J
UDGE
¶7
-2-
Coram
AI extract
VINEET SARAN
DR. B.R.SARANGI
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court