Niranjan Rout v. Bijay Ku.Pattnaik
Case brief
What is this about?
Two-judge bench dismissed a contempt petition dated 03.22.08.2017 No one is present. The court noted the petitioner was not interested and found no merit in the matter.
Two-judge bench dismissed a contempt petition dated 03.22.08.2017 No one is present. The court noted the petitioner was not interested and found no merit in the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CONTC No. 70 of 2002
03. 22.08.2017 No one is present.
This matter relates to the year 2002. The case was last listed on 24.02.2003, thereaf
ter no effort has been made by the petitioner to get the matter listed. It appears that the p
etitioner is no longer interested in pressing the matter.
Having gone through the record, we do not find any merit in the matter. Accordingly,
this contempt petition is dismissed.
..
(VINEET SARAN)
CHIEF JUSTICE
..
(DR. B.R. SARANGI)
JUDGE
Alok/Ashok
2
Alok/Ashok
The State
VINEET SARAN
DR. B.R. SARANGI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court