Dismissed
Lingaraj Mohanty v. Indian Oil Corpn.
Orissa HCWP(C)/4056/2002
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
No. 4056 of 2002 09. 21.08.2017 No one is…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(C). No. 4056 of 2002
09. 21.08.2017 No one is present on behalf of the petitioner even on revised
call.
Sri S.Nanda, learned counsel appearing for the opposite party no.1 submits tha
t by efflux of time, this writ petition has become infructuous.
The petition is accordingly dismissed for want of prosecution.
........
( VINEET SARAN )
CHIEF JUSTICE
....
( DR. B.R.SARANGI )
JUDGE
VINEET SARAN
DR. B.R.SARANGI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court