This judgment is a thin order disposing of a writ petition by relying on the reasons given in the order passed on the same day in W.P.(C) No.12583 of 2015. The decision contains no substantive discussion or propositions for citation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(C) No. 9899 of 2015
05. 11.05.2016 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
The facts of this case are similar to the facts of W.P.(C) No.12583 of 2015 di
sposed of today. As such, learned counsel for the parties submit that this writ petition may b
e disposed of for the reasons given in the order passed today in W.P.(C) No.12583 of 2015.
Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of in terms of the order passed to
day in W.P.(C) No.12583 of 2015.
.......
( VINEET SARAN )
CHIEF JUSTICE
....
( DR. B.R. SARANGI )
JUDGE
dm
-2-
VINEET SARAN
DR. B.R. SARANGI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court