Dismissed
Dr.Ashok Ku.Jena v. State
Orissa HCWP(C)/7442/2006
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The petition was dismissed in absentia as the petitioner did not appear on revised call. The High Court held that the prayer did not deserve to be granted in writ jurisdiction.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
W.P.(C) No. 7442 of 2006
¶2
09. 23.11.2016 No one is present on behalf of the petitioner even on revised
call.
¶3
Having heard learned Government Advocate appearing for State-opposite parties
and on perusal of record, we are of the opinion that in the facts of the case, prayer made in
this case does not deserve to be granted in the writ jurisdiction.
The petition is accordingly dismissed.
¶4
.......
( VINEET SARAN )
CHIEF JUSTICE
....
( DR. B.R. SARANGI )
JUDGE
dm
¶5
-2-
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Petitioner
- respondent
State-opposite parties
Coram
AI extract
VINEET SARAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court