Dismissed
Dr.Prasanta Kumar Rout v. State of Orissa
Orissa HCOJC/3293/1995
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
3293 of 1995 04. 22.11.2016 Learned counsel…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
04. 22.11.2016 Learned counsel for the petitioner states that he has no instr
uction from his client.
Having heard learned Government Advocate appearing for State-opposite parties
and on perusal of record, we are of the opinion that in the facts of the case, prayer made in
this case does not deserve to be granted in the writ jurisdiction.
The petition is accordingly dismissed.
.......
( VINEET SARAN )
....
( DR. B.R. SARANGI )
JUDGE
dm
-2-
Petitioner
State-opposite parties
VINEET SARAN
DR. B.R. SARANGI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court