Dismissed
Jnanendra v. State
Orissa HCOJC/1810/1995
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Prayer in the writ petition does not deserve to be granted in writ jurisdiction. The petition is dismissed with costs. No specific grounds or legal principles detailed in this brief order.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
OJC No. 1810 of 1995
¶2
12. 22.11.2016 Learned counsel for the petitioners states that he has no inst
ruction from his client.
¶3
Having heard learned Government Advocate appearing for State-opposite parties,
Mr. S.K.Mohanty, learned counsel appearing for opposite party no.3 and on perusal of record,
we are of the opinion that in the facts of the case, prayer made in this case does not deserve
to be granted in the writ jurisdiction.
¶4
The petition is accordingly dismissed.
¶5
.......
( VINEET SARAN )
¶6
CHIEF JUSTICE
¶7
( DR. B.R. SARANGI )
JUDGE
dm
¶8
-2-
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
petitioners
- respondent
State-opposite parties
- respondent
opposite party no.3
Coram
AI extract
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court