4. Pursuant to issuance of notice, a counter affidavit has been filed by the Asst. Project Director (MIS), Bargarh on behalf of opposite parties 1 and 2. It is stated that the petitioner applied to be engaged as GRS under Sanbausen G.P. He was provisionally selected. Accordingly, intimation was sent to him, vide AnnexureA/1. While the matter stood thus, opposite party no.4 submitted a complaint stating therein that he had secured more marks than the petitioner in +2 examination and, as such, he was eligible to the post of GRS. But then, his case had been ignored. On receipt of the complaint from opposite party no.4, opposite party no.1 directed an enquiry. On scrutiny of the mark sheet of +2 examination issued by CHSE, Orissa in favour of opposite party no.4, it was found that he secured 30 marks in English in +2 examination for the first time but he failed. Subsequently, he passed the examination compartmentally by securing 91 marks in English and, as such, his marks in +2 examination were arrived at as 449 (388-30+91). Opposite party no.4 had secured highest marks amongst all candidates. The selection of GRS is made according to marks secured in +2 examination. Opposite party no.4 has secured more marks than the petitioner and, as such, he is eligible to the post of GRS. The petitioner was wrongly selected and engaged as GRS. Accordingly, show cause was issued by the opposite party no.1. The petitioner submitted his reply. The same was examined and rejected by the opposite party no.1. The petitioner had never asked for any mark sheet or document of the opposite party no.4. He participated in the proceeding. It is further stated that the Sarpanch, Sanbausen G.P was instructed on 25.4.2008 to disengage the petitioner and engage opposite party no.4 in his place.
