Naba Kishore Rout v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
NO.18029 OF 2009 06.4.2016 Heard learned…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(C) NO.18029 OF 2009
06.4.2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Addl. Government Advocate.
2. This Writ Petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging the entry made by the
Asst. Settlement Officer, Major Settlement, Cuttack opposite party no.3 in the settlement Rec
ords of Right under Annexure-4 published in the year 1990.
3. Law is well settled that the Records of Right published by the Settlement authorities can neither create nor extinguish title of any party.
4. In view of the above, this Court is not inclined to interfere with the matter. However , it is open to the petitioner to approach the competent court of law for redressal of his gri evance if any, if so advised.
The Writ Petition along with Misc. Case is accordingly dismissed.
S.Panda, J.
2
1 provisions across 1 enactments
petitioner
Asst. Settlement Officer, Major Settlement, Cuttack
S.Panda
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court