Dismissed
Nandakishore v. State
Orissa HCOJC/8290/1995
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The court considered a counter-affidavit stating that the police station was constructed on the Government's own land and the grievance no longer existed, leading to the dismissal of the writ petition.
What did the court decide?
Liberty granted to petitioners to file a fresh petition in case any cause of action survives.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
OJC No. 8290 of 1995
06. 22.08.2016 Learned Government Advocate states that no land of the school in quest
ion has been taken over by the Government or the Police Department for construction of a Polic
e Station.
¶2
In paragraphs-6, 7 and 8 of the counter affidavit, it has been stated that the
police station has already been constructed on the own land of the Government. As such, the g
rievance of the petitioners no longer exists.
¶3
The writ petition is accordingly dismissed with liberty to the petitioners to
file a fresh petition in case of any cause of action still survives.
¶4
........
( VINEET SARAN )
CHIEF JUSTICE
¶5
....
( DR. B.R. SARANGI )
JUDGE
¶6
dm
¶7
-2-
Coram
AI extract
VINEET SARAN
DR. B.R. SARANGI
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court